Friday, March 6, 2009

Islam 101 from Geert Wilders

Just came across this intro to Islam from Geert Wilders on FaithFreedom.org It is definitely worth a read:

Allow me to give you a brief Islam 101. The first thing you need to know about Islam is the importance of the book of the Koran. The Koran is Allah’s personal word, revealed by an angel to Mohammed, the prophet.

This is where the trouble starts. Every word in the Koran is Allah’s word and therefore not open to discussion or interpretation. It is valid for every Moslem and for all times.

Therefore, there is no such a thing as moderate Islam.

Sure, there are a lot of moderate Moslems. But a moderate Islam is non-existent. The Koran calls for hatred, violence, submission, murder, and terrorism. The Koran calls for Moslems to kill non-Moslems, to terrorize non-Moslems and to fulfill their duty to wage war: violent jihad. Jihad is a duty for every Moslem, Islam is to rule the world - by the sword. The Koran is clearly anti-Semitic, describing Jews as monkeys and pigs.

The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behavior is an example to all Moslems and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem.

But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, and a pedophile. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. He advised on matters of slavery, but never advised to liberate slaves.

Islam has no other morality than the advancement of Islam. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad. There is no gray area or other side.

Koran as Allah’s own word and Mohammed as the perfect man are the two most important facets of Islam. Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a hereafter, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology.

It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means ’submission’. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia.

If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies. This is what you need to know about Islam, in order to understand what is going on in Europe.

Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam “the most retrograde force in the world,” and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Koran: Mein Kampf, he said, is “the new Koran of faith and war.”

5 comments:

The Chaplain said...

Of course all this is true. The Muslims reported it in their own historical writings. We know it because they proudly told it.

See www.allah-101.org

Chaplain @ www.chaplain-101.org/

Black_Rain said...

i thought the post was quite good, to the point, fairly brief.

i keep trying to tell people that there is NO Islam Lite... there is just 'Islam', and Islam has no redeeming qualities. the problem is that it takes some effort to figure this out. there are Suras that sound reasonable, almost Christian.. but the Reality is the context.. the "Rest of the Story" is in the 2 other books. like the Quote Obama used in an early speech, that Muhammad preached tolerance, cooperation and good will for Infidels. sounded good but the "Rest of the Story" is that he was telling his thugs, slavers and thieves not to slaughter the infidels closest to them, but to fake tolerance and slaughter, loot and slave the women and children quietly furthest out and work your way in.. apparently because the ones further out could unite and retaliate in a large group. small village mass home invasion is preferable to a huge battle you might lose. attacking the helpless was what he did best.

IslamoPhobia, a Phobia is an "Unreasonable Fear"... there are Reasonable fears because it's all about what Muhammad Said/did. i don't think Islam is even a religion, it is 'Muhammadanism'. it's a Psychotic Narcissistic Personality Cult.

i did read that about 75% of western converts quit within a couple years.. if they aren't trapped in some Islamic Republic as a sex slave and baby maker for the Prophet. it is such a cult that even the people that realize what it truly is it can take like 4 years before they decide to do something. i read a book called Why We Left Islam.. sad story's.

i did a study in the early 70's on cults, i was even kidnapped for 2 weeks by the Moonies. Islam has lots of symptoms of being a cult. talking to the Muslims i have.. reminds me of talking to other cult victims. exactly the same type of Apriori Logical Loop. including that edgy fear building as it goes along when you don't submit to their endeavor to 'Turn' you into them.

i believe the INTERNET is a good tool to make it safer. but i am not even too sure about that.

I'm reading Spencer's, 'The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran'.. and Nonie Darwish's 'Cruel and Unusual Punishment' about Sharia law..facinatig and one of the best i have read yet.

the further i get into this study the worse it sounds.. especially the Biographies of the Apostate Women.. how can this be happening in the 21st Century i cry.? because there people determined to drag us back to 622ad or kill us.!!

people feel safe for many reasons.. aren't many around, not all are Jihadists..whatever, but they are satisfied with "well 100 years from now".. and within 50 years maybe 4, maybe 5 EU countries will be Muslim Dominated.
i gave female friends from Germany who emigrated to the USA because the Muslims became so threatening. surrounding her on the bus.. following her on the street, she knew what the Arabic word was for Whore by then.. i am seeing more and more here all the time.

as i always qualify my stand.. i am sure there are lots of Muslims just trying to feed their families and do the best they can in a bad situation... but then i wonder what they/or their kids will do under orders of the Imam.. down the time line.

Editor said...

Re "moderate muslims":

When a 'moderate muslim' is smiling at you, it's because you remind him of Danny Pearl.

How can you tell the difference between a moderate muslim
and an islamic fundamentalist?

The moderate is holding a REMOTE detonator.

Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes...

Radical Fundamentalist Islam Is A Death Cult:

MODERATE ISLAM IS IT'S TROJAN HORSE.

Witcher said...

The first problem with Islam is that it's an Abrahamic religion and, as every schoolchild knows, Deuteronomy is the template for genocide in the West.

Churchill? You may find some of his words consoling, but he was a terrible anti-Semite. It's hard to explain away words like these:

"This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing."

Inexcusable!

Silly Allah said...

Hey Witcher, where did you find that quote? I went to Wikiquote (I know, not the greatest source) and couldn't find it. I did find this:

"First there are the Jews who, dwelling in every country throughout the world, identify themselves with that country, enter into its national life and, while adhering faithfully to their own religion, regard themselves as citizens in the fullest sense of the State which has received them. Such a Jew living in England would say, 'I am an English man practising the Jewish faith.' This is a worthy conception, and useful in the highest degree. We in Great Britain well know that during the great struggle the influence of what may be called the 'National Jews' in many lands was cast preponderatingly on the side of the Allies; and in our own Army Jewish soldiers have played a most distinguished part, some rising to the command of armies, others winning the Victoria Cross for valour.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd) or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing."

While it is generally apologetic of Jews, it is also critical. Either way, I am not a fan of Churchill all the way. I have many an Indian friend complain about him from a colonial standpoint.

As per the Abrahamic religions, I agree that they all have some bad stuff in their books. However, Geert Wilders nails this one quite well in his opening:

"The first thing you need to know about Islam is the importance of the book of the Koran. The Koran is Allah’s personal word, revealed by an angel to Mohammed, the prophet.
This is where the trouble starts. Every word in the Koran is Allah’s word and therefore not open to discussion or interpretation. It is valid for every Moslem and for all times.
Therefore, there is no such a thing as moderate Islam."

The other Abrahamic religions view their books as the words of man, inspired by god. So there is room for interpretation and room for moderate Christianity and Judaism as well as moderate Christians and Jews, which is Geert Wilders point.

For me, I'd rather not have any religion, but I'd at least take one that didn't have god's literal word telling its followers to convert or kill me.