Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Captured Mumbai terrorist talks while Pakistanis claim it was "Hindu Zionists"

Since the authorities have captured one of the Mumbai Jihadi's, we find out the truth:

“From there, they mandated to kill indiscriminately, particularly white foreign tourists, and spare Muslims split up into five batches. Two of them Ismail and Ajmal took a taxi to Victoria Terminus. Three other batches of two each headed for Oberoi Hotel, Cafe Leopold and Nariman House. The remaining four went to Taj Hotel.”

“Spare Muslims” - why?
Quran 4:93
And whoever kills a believer intentionally, his punishment is hell; he shall abide in it, and Allah will send His wrath on him and curse him and prepare for him a painful chastisement.

Contrast that to:

Quran 9:5
So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.


Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177:
Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”

You see, unbelievers are fine to slay, especially those Jews…but don’t touch another Muslim!

Hindu Zionists?!?

While the captured Jihadi was talking, a Pakistani TV show decided to blame the whole affair on Hindu Zionists. Go here for more and a link to the video, if you can understand.

They "accused India, the US and Israel of hatching a conspiracy to defame Pakistan. The program, anchored by Qudsia Qadri, was completely outrageous and reflected the Pakistani mindset towards India."


Just saw this blog post from Patterico. The MSM has been apologizing on behalf of Islam for so long that journalists are fully blind to Islam's promotion of hatred and violence towards Jews:

On Thursday during CNN’s coverage of the Mumbai terror attacks, a CNN security analyst couldn’t understand why the terrorists targeted a Jewish Center:

And we still - but we still do not know a motive. You know, you look at the Jewish center. Why did they hit the Jewish center? You know, and you look at the other places, you know, big icons where there are going to be a lot of people. And that’s what terrorists do. They hit places that they consider soft targets where they can have the most bang for the buck, if you will, and where there are a lot of people - hotels, train stations, those kind of things.

Jihadwatch just reported on this article in the Washington Post, which tells us a little more about the captured terrorist:

Bharti, the interrogator, said Kasab has told police that he is from a village called Faridkot, in Pakistan's Punjab province, and that he dropped out of school after the fourth grade. His father owned a food stall. An acquaintance introduced him to an outlawed group called Lashkar-i-Taiba in 2005, Bharti said, and Kasab later trained with the group in Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistani-controlled Kashmir.

"He went through different stages of training. At first, it was the recitation of the Koran and lectures about jihad. He was being prepared mentally. Then small-weapons training," Bharti said in an interview. "Then came the hard physical, marine training. At first, Kasab used to vomit. They were taught how to survive at sea, on ground, and how to control thirst and hunger. From a batch of about 25, 10 were handpicked for the Mumbai mission."

Now even the Washington Post understands that Islam had something to do with it. Maybe CNN will realize why they attacked the Jewish Center after all.


New data has come on to confirm that Mumbai attacks were in the name of Islam, and targeted Jews...Phone Transcripts of Mumbai Attacks Indicate Gunmen Not Acting Alone:

The handlers told a team of gunmen who had seized a Jewish center to shoot hostages if necessary.

"If you are still threatened, then don't saddle yourself with the burden of the hostages. Immediately kill them," he said.

Six Jewish foreigners, including a rabbi and his wife, were killed inside the Jewish center.

Later in the night, nearly 24 hours after the attacks began, the handlers urged the gunmen to "be strong in the name of Allah"

"Brother, you have to fight. This is a matter of prestige of Islam," the handler said. "You may feel tired or sleepy, but the commandos of Islam have left everything behind, their mothers, their fathers."

The gunmen were told several times not to kill any Muslim hostages.


Always On Watch said...

The more we learn about Mumbai, the more we learn the kind of monsters who perpetrated the attack.

Jana said...

Poooor guy, you're soooo lost. It's very easy to understand the meaning you want to understand and look for justifying in bad deeds of people. Look to God and ask, don't ask mistaken and unperfect people.
Noone can ever get any justice in this world, because of that we live so short!

Good luck! Something very big and hot is waiting for you afterlife, but don't complain after...

Silly Allah said...

Sounds like a threat "Something very big and hot is waiting for you afterlife"

Sounds like:
22:19 These twain (the believers and the disbelievers) are two opponents who contend concerning their Lord. But as for those who disbelieve, garments of fire will be cut out for them; boiling fluid will be poured down on their heads [103, Medina ]
22:20 Whereby that which is in their bellies, and their skins too, will be melted; [103, Medina ]
22:21 And for them are hooked rods of iron. [103, Medina ]
22:22 Whenever, in their anguish, they would go forth from thence they are driven back therein and (it is said unto them): Taste the doom of burning.

Anyway, the afterlife is even shorter than "this world" because there is no afterlife.

Omar said...

hmm, doesn't the claim that "hindu zionists" were involved indicate at least some pakistani's unwillingness to be associated with these atrocities? It's not like any Muslims are defending the actions of these monsters right? Does that fact escape you in your obsession to defame Islam and Muslims?

Silly Allah said...

"It's not like any Muslims are defending the actions of these monsters right?"
Wrong -
"The battle that is underway in Mumbai is a battle for Allah between its servants and the infidels," said another message published on the al-Falluja forum.
The article mentions Al Qaeda websites, but the verbiage does not use the attack as a success of Al Qaeda against the rest of world. It phrases it as a success of Islam against the infidels. Unfortunately, they are more correct than you for the Quran says:

Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority: their abode will be the Fire: And evil is the home of the wrong-doers! (3:151)

Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them." This because they contended against Allah and His Messenger: If any contend against Allah and His Messenger, Allah is strict in punishment. (8:12-13)

Then of course there's the 'blame the Jooos because we didn't do it' BS:
"Mossad-CIA Connection To Mumbai Terror Attacks?" http://www.countercurrents.org/sikand291108.htm
"Is Mossad Hand Behind Mumbai Train Blasts?" http://kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2006/08/03/5177.shtml
and many more that I was too disgusted to link to. Just search "Mossad and Mumbai" in Google and you'll find thousands of posts.

You see Taqqiyah brings about the disgusting capability for Muslims to turn a tragedy that they created into a tragedy thrust upon them. The same thing happened on 9-11. I was actually traveling through Muslim countries (supposedly moderately Muslim) after 9-11 , and everybody (and I mean everybody) told me how the Mossad accomplished it. This kind of dishonesty is part of a disinformation strategy, standard for Islam and not limited to Pakistani tv hosts.

Omar said...

Taqiyyah is lying to protect your life. Muslims are generally forbidden from telling lies and it's considered a major sin. An annoying tactic from defamers of Islam is to speak ignorantly on behalf of Islam and misrepresent the sacred texts, and when Muslims come to the defense of their own religion, they get accused of lying. Impossible to win a debate against someone who accuses you of lying with every word. Well done.

You still didn't manage to account for Muslims, apparently everywhere you meet, not supporting these attacks and instead saying these attacks are so evil that only the wicked Mossad would perpetuate them in an attempt to blame Muslims. This should indicate two extremely obvious things that anybody without an agenda should be able to understand:

1) The Muslims you meet do not support the attacks. Notice they do not say, as you seem to think they should be saying, "These attacks are a part of our religion blah blah death to infidels." Nope, you only hear fringe terrorists like Al Qaeda saying that on their websites. Ordinary Muslims you meet don't really say that do they?

2) Terrorists like Al Qaeda are so far removed from mainstream Muslim society that ordinary Muslims you meet do not consider them the usual suspects. They're not able to immediately point and say, "ahh must be the neighborhood terrorists - they're likely to do stuff like this." No, they say, "this must be something from outside our communities." Very telling.

Silly Allah said...

You should read my post on Taqiyyah. You wrote this:
"Taqiyyah is lying to protect your life. Muslims are generally forbidden from telling lies and it's considered a major sin. "
Really? You know better than Muhammad?
No. 2519 - Narrated Um Kulthum bint Uqba:

That she heard Allah's Apostle saying, "He who makes peace between the people by INVENTING good information or saying good things, is not a liar."

I guess it depends on your definition of liar, right?

Do you know better than Imam Abu Hammid Ghazali?
Imam Abu Hammid Ghazali says: "Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible." (Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri, The Reliance of the Traveller, translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller, amana publications, 1997, section r8.2, page 745)

It is only illegal if achieving the aim can't be accomplished by telling the truth. Very different than what you said - were you lying to achieve an aim?

Did you even read the links that I sent you? Did you read the comments? Did you do the Google search? Did you read comments posted on any other pages attempting to link Mossad and Mumbai?

So let me get this straight - supposedly "moderate Muslims" tell me that it was the Jews that did 9-11, and you say that they are just denying Islamic responsibility, they are "instead saying these attacks are so evil that only the wicked Mossad would perpetuate them." Hmm...do you not see the problem in what your wrote? Now you have joined the pack by turning denial into Jewish hate. Yes, they did say "wicked Mossad" and they also said "vicious Jews did this" because "the Jews benefited"..."the Jews"..."the Joooos!!"...So you are one of them, too? You claim to be one of the few good Muslims, yet "wicket Mossad" flowed so well out of your keyboard. Do you know how many times I've been called "terrible Jew" just for pointing out issues with Islam? I even say that I am just an atheist right away, yet Muslims have no problems claiming I'm a Jew, then blaming the Jews for all their problems while pushing hate on Jews. Sometimes they call me a Hindu or homosexual (even though I'm neither of them). Hmm...where does this hatred of Jews come from? (Remember I was in places that may have had no Jews at all):

Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”
This quote was on this very page, and you made the point for me.

No, I'm not buying your apologetics and neither are the non-Muslim readers of this blog. Muslims benefit from the terror they create, even when it is a different Muslim that carried it out. The denial is part of Taqqiyah as a means to an end. Then, the event is used to tarnish the image of the key enemy and push an agenda, whether that be in India, US, Israel, Thailand, Aceh, Lebanon, Nigeria, Philippines, Darfur, China, Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Chechnya,...

Again, I wish you were right. Unfortunately, the "fringe," as you call them, are so numerous that I get vicious, threatening emails every day. So does Pat Condell on youtube, so does Ali Sina at FaithFreedom.org, so does Robert Spencer at Jihadwatch.org, so does anybody else with a site that criticizes Islam. Are the people threatening Hirsi Ali "fringe"? Are the people wanting to kill Salman Rushdie "fringe"? Are the many people who demonstrated and killed in the name of Allah over cartoons "fringe"?

Let's analyze your "fringe" comment with real data rather than your blind, "wicked" assertions:
The extent of support for global jihad is frightening in its proportions, and the numbers are anything but insignificant.
If all the supporters of Islamic violence are fringe, then explain these numbers:

"In a poll broadcast on Britain's Channel 4 TV, nearly 25% of British Muslims said the July 7, 2005, terror bombings in London, which killed 52 innocent commuters, were justified."

A survey published in December[2006] found that 44% of Nigerian Muslims believe suicide bombing attacks are "often" or "sometimes" acceptable. Only 28% said they were never justified.

According to the annual Pew Global Attitudes Survey, released in July 2006, "roughly one-in-seven Muslims in France, Spain and Great Britain feel that suicide bombings against civilian targets can at least sometimes be justified to defend Islam." The report also found that less than half of Jordan's Muslims believe terror attacks are never justified. In Egypt, only 45% of Muslims say terror is never justified.

STILL THINK only a "tiny minority" are in favor of violence?

On the fifth anniversary of the September 11 attacks, a survey conducted by Al-Jazeera asked respondents, "Do you support Osama Bin-Laden?" A whopping 49.9% answered: yes.

July 2006 global Pew survey found that among Muslims, a quarter of Jordanians, a third of Indonesians, 38% of Pakistanis and 61% of Nigerians all expressed confidence in the mass murderer who founded al-Qaida."

Sorry, but your "fringe" comment is just more distortion.

Finally, you have specifically avoided my main point - which is that Islam itself encourages violence. You cannot dispute the obvious Quran verses and Hadith that have been posted. Instead you use fallacies to argue around the subject - attempting (and failing) to label the followers of the obvious violent prescriptions in Islam as "fringe." Your denial is worse than the direct threats because of its inherent dishonesty.